The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's "Enabling Patient-Centered Care through Health Information Technology" report finds substantial evidence that health information technology applications with patient-centered care-related components have a positive effect on healthcare outcomes.
AHRQ researchers reviewed citations to identify randomized controlled trials of PCC-related HIT interventions and studies. The report identified numerous positive effects and facilitators for the ability of HIT to enhance patient-centered care as well as many barriers.
PCC-related HIT was found to have positive effects on the following:
• Healthcare process outcomes.
• Disease-specific clinical outcomes — diabetes mellitus, heart disease and cancer.
• Responsiveness to the needs and preferences of patients.
• Shared decision-making.
• Patient-clinician communication.
• Access to medical information.
The study also reported facilitators for the utilization of HIT:
• Ease of use.
• Perceived usefulness.
• Efficiency of use.
• Availability of support.
• Comfort in use.
• Site location.
However, there were also a number of barriers:
• Lack of usability.
• Problems with access to the HIT application due to older age, low income, education, cognitive impairment and other factors.
• Low computer literacy in patients and clinicians.
• Insufficient basic formal training.
• Physicians' concerns about more work.
• Workflow issues.
• Depersonalization.
• Incompatibility with current healthcare practices.
• Lack of standardization.
• Problems with reimbursement.
12 New Practices Select Merge Healthcare's EHR to Meet Meaningful Use Requirements
American Health Lawyers Association Announces EHR Liability Research Project
AHRQ researchers reviewed citations to identify randomized controlled trials of PCC-related HIT interventions and studies. The report identified numerous positive effects and facilitators for the ability of HIT to enhance patient-centered care as well as many barriers.
PCC-related HIT was found to have positive effects on the following:
• Healthcare process outcomes.
• Disease-specific clinical outcomes — diabetes mellitus, heart disease and cancer.
• Responsiveness to the needs and preferences of patients.
• Shared decision-making.
• Patient-clinician communication.
• Access to medical information.
The study also reported facilitators for the utilization of HIT:
• Ease of use.
• Perceived usefulness.
• Efficiency of use.
• Availability of support.
• Comfort in use.
• Site location.
However, there were also a number of barriers:
• Lack of usability.
• Problems with access to the HIT application due to older age, low income, education, cognitive impairment and other factors.
• Low computer literacy in patients and clinicians.
• Insufficient basic formal training.
• Physicians' concerns about more work.
• Workflow issues.
• Depersonalization.
• Incompatibility with current healthcare practices.
• Lack of standardization.
• Problems with reimbursement.
More Articles on Health Information Technology:
Report: California EHR Use Falls Short of Federal Standards12 New Practices Select Merge Healthcare's EHR to Meet Meaningful Use Requirements
American Health Lawyers Association Announces EHR Liability Research Project